Penske Media Takes Aim at Google Over AI News Summaries

Penske Media Group just dropped an unexpected bombshell in Washington, D.C.—they’ve filed a federal lawsuit against Google. The heart of the dispute? Google’s AI-driven “Overviews” that summarize full news stories without getting the green light from publishers.

The Lawsuit Unpacked

At first glance, this might feel like another tech-versus-media tug-of-war. But Penske isn’t messing around. They own heavyweight outlets—Variety, Billboard and Rolling Stone among them—and they claim Google’s AI summaries are literally siphoning traffic away from their sites. When readers glance at Google’s search results, about one in five hits now feature an Overview box that lays out the gist. No clicks needed. No page loads. No ad impressions.

According to their complaint, Google quietly operates a two-tiered system. If a publisher agrees to let Google riff on its articles, that publisher shows up in the AI summaries. If not? Google’s algorithm buries them. Penske argues this amounts to coercion. Publishers who refuse to participate get punished in search rankings. Google even trains its AI on their reporting, they say, without paying a dime.

Why This Matters

Think of it this way: You spend weeks chasing sources, refining copy, hammering on headlines—only to see a handful of AI-generated bullet points steal your thunder. It’s like baking a sourdough starter and watching someone else slice your loaf and serve it at breakfast. Not cool, right?

The stakes aren’t tiny. Ad-supported and subscription models depend on eyeballs and clicks. A dip in traffic translates directly to lost revenue. And for an industry still reeling from the collapse of display-ad rates, it feels like one slap too many.

Google Fires Back

Not surprisingly, Google isn’t rolling over. Spokesperson Jose Castaneda insists that AI Overviews actually boost discovery. “People find Search more helpful and use it more, creating new opportunities for content to be discovered,” he told Reuters. Meritless claims, Google says, though they’ve yet to draw sellers into binding licensing deals like OpenAI has.

Meanwhile, publishers are left wondering: Will antitrust wins—like the recent Chrome ruling—offer any real opt-out? Or are they forever caught in Google’s gravitational pull?

Penske’s case could set a precedent. If they win, Google might have to negotiate licenses or pay fees to summarize articles—and perhaps rethink the power imbalance they’ve leveraged for years.

What do you think? Is Google overstepping, or is this just the cost of free information in the digital age? Share your take in the comments below, and don’t forget to follow Outreach Bee on Facebook, X (Twitter), or LinkedIn for more insights and updates.

Before you go, check this new data that reveals surprising habits about ChatGPT users and why they still can’t quit Google.

Also, FTC probes Google and Amazon over ad pricing disclosures. Here is what you need to know.

Sources:

• www.edition.cnn.com/2025/09/14/tech/rolling-stone-billboard-penske-sues-google-ai-hnk